<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s all subjective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/</link>
	<description>A clueless and confused enthusiast&#039;s photographic exploits and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: One of my bright ideas &#124; Adventures of an Idiot &#8211; occasional ramblings of a photography freak</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[One of my bright ideas &#124; Adventures of an Idiot &#8211; occasional ramblings of a photography freak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 12:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.com/?p=1097#comment-2481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] camera that I haven&#8217;t actually used for, oh, nearly a year or so. Cos I&#8217;d had &#8220;issues&#8221; with it. One of which was its somewhat questionable rendition of colour. That had provided [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] camera that I haven&#8217;t actually used for, oh, nearly a year or so. Cos I&#8217;d had &#8220;issues&#8221; with it. One of which was its somewhat questionable rendition of colour. That had provided [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotdmike</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fotdmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.com/?p=1097#comment-1441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, these colour variations are a source of ongoing frustration for me. Its not just colour either, its also &lt;em&gt;brightness&lt;/em&gt;. The level at which this is set on any given screen can make a &lt;em&gt;huge&lt;/em&gt; difference to how a photo appears... and who&#039;s to say what&#039;s &quot;right&quot;? So what should be taken as a standard to be sure that the majority of people see a pic as the photographer intends?
And (this being possibly the more pertinent issue) the presence of such variations could even conceivably lead to the photographer him/herself not being certain which version is &quot;right&quot;. After all, how reliable is peoples&#039; &quot;colour memory&quot;? Not as reliable as we&#039;d imagine, I&#039;m suspecting. Certainly my own experiences (most recently with some shots I did of traffic bollards in my village) are leading me to that conclusion.

Not entirely unconnected to this, I&#039;m also reminded of how one&#039;s own &quot;colour vision&quot; can be impacted by ambient lighting to the extent that one temporarily sees everything with a distinct colour-caste. Yet, because this is part of one&#039;s own vision, one may not realise the phenomenon&#039;s occurring.
This is a recollection from my old graphics days and remembering that working for any significant length of time in a darkroom with a tinted light source would impart a colour-caste to one&#039;s vision for a period of time having returned to &quot;normal&quot; daylight.

But is such an effect confined just to darkroom workers? Likely not. 

Maybe it wouldn&#039;t be such a huge issue for me if I weren&#039;t habitually swapping between different machines to do various things. If I only ever worked on the one machine then I&#039;d probably be unaware that the problem even existed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, these colour variations are a source of ongoing frustration for me. Its not just colour either, its also <em>brightness</em>. The level at which this is set on any given screen can make a <em>huge</em> difference to how a photo appears&#8230; and who&#8217;s to say what&#8217;s &#8220;right&#8221;? So what should be taken as a standard to be sure that the majority of people see a pic as the photographer intends?<br />
And (this being possibly the more pertinent issue) the presence of such variations could even conceivably lead to the photographer him/herself not being certain which version is &#8220;right&#8221;. After all, how reliable is peoples&#8217; &#8220;colour memory&#8221;? Not as reliable as we&#8217;d imagine, I&#8217;m suspecting. Certainly my own experiences (most recently with some shots I did of traffic bollards in my village) are leading me to that conclusion.</p>
<p>Not entirely unconnected to this, I&#8217;m also reminded of how one&#8217;s own &#8220;colour vision&#8221; can be impacted by ambient lighting to the extent that one temporarily sees everything with a distinct colour-caste. Yet, because this is part of one&#8217;s own vision, one may not realise the phenomenon&#8217;s occurring.<br />
This is a recollection from my old graphics days and remembering that working for any significant length of time in a darkroom with a tinted light source would impart a colour-caste to one&#8217;s vision for a period of time having returned to &#8220;normal&#8221; daylight.</p>
<p>But is such an effect confined just to darkroom workers? Likely not. </p>
<p>Maybe it wouldn&#8217;t be such a huge issue for me if I weren&#8217;t habitually swapping between different machines to do various things. If I only ever worked on the one machine then I&#8217;d probably be unaware that the problem even existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forkboy</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forkboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.com/?p=1097#comment-1424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rather large variation in all matters colour-related.  I imagine it does leave one questioning the point of it all considering the markedly different results.

This must be a sign that we should all switch to black &amp; white only ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rather large variation in all matters colour-related.  I imagine it does leave one questioning the point of it all considering the markedly different results.</p>
<p>This must be a sign that we should all switch to black &amp; white only <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotdmike</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fotdmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.com/?p=1097#comment-1406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bizarre, isn&#039;t it? And I can&#039;t even say which one is &quot;correct&quot;, or most &quot;accurate&quot;. For it all depends which machine I&#039;m using to look at them with. I find the whole thing of &quot;colour consistency&quot; and related matters (as they apply to the Web at least) incredibly frustrating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bizarre, isn&#8217;t it? And I can&#8217;t even say which one is &#8220;correct&#8221;, or most &#8220;accurate&#8221;. For it all depends which machine I&#8217;m using to look at them with. I find the whole thing of &#8220;colour consistency&#8221; and related matters (as they apply to the Web at least) incredibly frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2009/07/13/its-all-subjective/#comment-1405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 02:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.com/?p=1097#comment-1405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i like the third photo, the one titled...GX20 sky colour test FS215B _G201237.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the third photo, the one titled&#8230;GX20 sky colour test FS215B _G201237.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

