Comments on: Samsung GX20 colour test #1 and #2 http://fotdmike.com/2008/07/14/samsung-gx20-colour-test-1/ A clueless and confused enthusiast's photographic exploits and thoughts Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:17:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: fotdmike http://fotdmike.com/2008/07/14/samsung-gx20-colour-test-1/#comment-589 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:34:09 +0000 http://fotdmike.wordpress.com/?p=200#comment-589 Re the question of detail and dynamic range, have answered this in comments in the previous posts.

Its not the exif data per se that you want to be thinking about, but how a given app reads or “interprets” the RAW file in rendering an image.

One test I have yet still to perform is to shoot in JPEG and see what that looks like straight off-camera. I have a sneaking suspicion they’ll be just fine.

]]> By: forkboy http://fotdmike.com/2008/07/14/samsung-gx20-colour-test-1/#comment-586 Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:06:17 +0000 http://fotdmike.wordpress.com/?p=200#comment-586 “Tweaked”? Surely you jest ;-)

I’m happy to read that you think the issue of detail may be no longer, but I still wonder if you aren’t getting less detail (and dynamic range, etc.) because of the change in sensor size and megapixels between the 10 and 20?

And I hadn’t really thought much about the EXIF data that comes over from the camera in relationship to RAW images. I’m glad you mentioned such as it provided food for thought at my end.

]]>