<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But I don&#8217;t tinker with pics, do I?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fotdmike.com/2008/06/12/but-i-dont-tinker-with-pics-do-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fotdmike.com/2008/06/12/but-i-dont-tinker-with-pics-do-i/</link>
	<description>A clueless and confused enthusiast&#039;s photographic exploits and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 10:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fotdmike</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2008/06/12/but-i-dont-tinker-with-pics-do-i/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fotdmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah Tam, working with RAW is really worth the effort... you can pull out so much more info. Although I use Lightroom (cos I&#039;ve become familiar with it I s&#039;pose) there are other RAW editors around and I think all dSLRs come with some form of RAW editor on a disc anyway.
Plus I think there&#039;s a plugin avaailable for Photoshop.
I promise you, if you persevere with it you&#039;ll find it well rewarding.

As for the above pic, yeah, I&#039;m quite pleased with it. In fact, I&#039;m sorely tempted to get a full-size version printed on some textured substrate (a rough cartridge paper maybe). Think it would really enhance the effect, particularly if it were sort of cream- or vellum-coloured.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah Tam, working with RAW is really worth the effort&#8230; you can pull out so much more info. Although I use Lightroom (cos I&#8217;ve become familiar with it I s&#8217;pose) there are other RAW editors around and I think all dSLRs come with some form of RAW editor on a disc anyway.<br />
Plus I think there&#8217;s a plugin avaailable for Photoshop.<br />
I promise you, if you persevere with it you&#8217;ll find it well rewarding.</p>
<p>As for the above pic, yeah, I&#8217;m quite pleased with it. In fact, I&#8217;m sorely tempted to get a full-size version printed on some textured substrate (a rough cartridge paper maybe). Think it would really enhance the effect, particularly if it were sort of cream- or vellum-coloured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tam</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2008/06/12/but-i-dont-tinker-with-pics-do-i/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoy &quot;playing&quot; with my photos sometimes. I really enjoy converting some to black and white, then doing a bit of tinting (like old hand tinted photos). 

Not long ago I snapped some photos in RAW format but I haven&#039;t done that enough to really know what I am doing. Unfortunately, I do not have Lightroom (the cost of the software is a bit high).  I have Elements 6.0 and Microsoft Digital Image Suite.  I use both.  

Your photos are always beautiful.  I love the colors.  I am with forkboy, I think the photo above is a GREAT photo.  I like it a lot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy &#8220;playing&#8221; with my photos sometimes. I really enjoy converting some to black and white, then doing a bit of tinting (like old hand tinted photos). </p>
<p>Not long ago I snapped some photos in RAW format but I haven&#8217;t done that enough to really know what I am doing. Unfortunately, I do not have Lightroom (the cost of the software is a bit high).  I have Elements 6.0 and Microsoft Digital Image Suite.  I use both.  </p>
<p>Your photos are always beautiful.  I love the colors.  I am with forkboy, I think the photo above is a GREAT photo.  I like it a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forkboy</title>
		<link>http://fotdmike.com/2008/06/12/but-i-dont-tinker-with-pics-do-i/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[forkboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fotdmike.wordpress.com/?p=117#comment-443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How very phallic!  But notice I didn&#039;t say &#039;artsy&#039; or anything like it!

I think I&#039;m with you on the post-processing thing.....I don&#039;t find it to be as creative as I find it boring. But maybe it&#039;s just my pictures that are boring?  

Regardless, at least you have tried and found that you can obtain results with which you are pleased.  Great job, sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How very phallic!  But notice I didn&#8217;t say &#8216;artsy&#8217; or anything like it!</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m with you on the post-processing thing&#8230;..I don&#8217;t find it to be as creative as I find it boring. But maybe it&#8217;s just my pictures that are boring?  </p>
<p>Regardless, at least you have tried and found that you can obtain results with which you are pleased.  Great job, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

